![]() It should have the ability to stand alone, on it's own merits and be able to survive separate from the writer's history. I told myself to go into 'The Cell' with an open mind, much like I try do with most of the books I read, even those writers that I have really loved and especially those I maybe just 'like', I have to tell myself each and every new book is a completely new story. You spent more time attacking me than explaining anything, but now that you have gotten your apparent dislike of my opinions out of the way, I would like to hear why you believe his other works are so strong. And you accuse me of making bad comments about SK in a forum where I am writing about one of my favorite books, written by SK. What is better about it? You claim they are among the most popular books in modern fiction- why? My questions were serious, I want to understand the draw of those books. ![]() What I am still curious about, and would welcome hearing your opinion on, is WHY his big-name books, like The Stand, are more popular. Now, according to a ranking on this site of SK's books, Cell is I believe in the top third (?) meaning it certainly isnt one of his least popular books according to his fans. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. ![]() ![]() ![]() I don't think you are close-minded at all- you have an opinion regarding Cell, just as I do. I have no intention of being disrespectful towards either SK or his fans. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |